This roughly translates to about a 3.8-3.9 on a 4.0 scale. AP and Honors courses are given weight to. Like I said earlier, my school has a very strange GPA system (12 point) that takes into account + and - when calculating GPA. I guess I'll post my stats just so others can have a more objective view. Is it true that a student with extraordinary essays who might be a bit less qualified in terms of academics (wondering about my 2 Bs) still has a decent change to be admitted? I've heard that essays can be deal makers/breakers. Īlso, my second question is about essays. I have a bunch of ECs (sports, volunteering, leadership, work, and clubs), so I'm not really worried about that. If I do wait to do regular decision, I'll take the SAT again and I think I can bring my score close to 2300. Sat score is 2260 and I have a few 750+ Sat 2s. My school isn't on a 4.0 gpa scale (we have a strange 11-point scale) but I've made all A's throughout my high school career with the exception of a couple of B+s (AP History, really hard teacher, and sophomore Spanish honors). My stats aren't too shabby, but I think I can raise my GPA with my first semester senior grades. I've also been told that if you don't make it in early, you wouldn't have gotten in regular decision. I've been told my many that if Stanford is your first choice, you should apply early. In 2020, voters rejected a measure that would have overturned the 1996 ban.Įight other states have followed California’s lead in forbidding race-conscious admissions policies at state universities, including Michigan, Florida and Washington.īut the ruling in the Harvard case extends that prohibition to private universities, including Stanford and USC.I'm going to be applying to Stanford this year and am in the process of deciding whether to apply early or not. The University of California and the California State University systems are prohibited from using race as an admissions factor under a ballot measure approved by voters in 1996. The impact of the rulings is likely to be limited in California, however. The vote was 6 to 3 in the North Carolina case and 6 to 2 in the Harvard case, from which Jackson, a former member of Harvard’s Board of Overseers, recused herself.Īffirmative action, like abortion, has been a target of the conservative legal movement for decades, and the court’s liberal precedents on these two major issues were put in danger when President Trump and Senate Republicans succeeded in appointing three new justices. In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual - not on the basis of race.” Or a benefit to a student whose heritage or culture motivated him or her to assume a leadership role or attain a particular goal must be tied to that student’s unique ability to contribute to the university. “A benefit to a student who overcame racial discrimination, for example, must be tied to that student’s courage and determination. “Nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise,” Roberts wrote. School officials are likely to focus on a passage near the end of the chief justice’s 40-page opinion:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |